Skip to main content

Profile


Politics is not just about power — it’s about meaning



Mahfud Anshori is a political culturalist with interest in political communication, media studies, and discourse analysis. His scholarship investigates how media framing constructs political narratives, how rhetoric and discourse shape public opinion and leadership, and how journalism functions as both a democratic institution and a site of ideological contestation.


Scopus ID:  58481104300
Sinta ID :  5993228                                          
Google Scholar :  bjD_p-IAAAAJ
email : metricpolitic@gmail.com

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Politics of Words: Exploring Ideographs in Action

  How do political words acquire meaning and power in public life? This article uncovers the crucial role of ideographs —politically charged words and symbols—in shaping ideology through everyday discourse. The findings show that these words are never neutral: their interpretations shift depending on whether they are spoken by those in power, by opposition leaders, or by civil society actors. A single word may legitimize authority in one context, yet express defiance in another, revealing that ideology is not fixed but constructed through the political position of its speaker. This study offers a fresh lens for understanding political communication by highlighting that who says what is just as important as the content itself. For scholars of discourse, rhetoric, and ideology, the article provides strong conceptual tools and valuable insights that can deepen research on language and power. Bagaimana kata-kata politik memperoleh makna dan kekuatan dalam kehidupan publik? Artikel ini...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gen Z and the Emotional Struggle of Polarization

  How do Generation Z students truly experience diversity in an increasingly polarized society? Is polarization merely ideological, or is it a deeper emotional struggle embedded in their daily lives? This article reveals that multicultural awareness is not just a civic value but a lived reality—negotiated in boarding houses, worship spaces, and the emotionally charged world of social media. What strategies do young people adopt—selective silence, content curation, or reflective restraint—to navigate these tensions? The findings highlight emotional literacy as a vital key to sustaining pluralism in fragmented digital societies. For scholars of communication, politics, education, and youth studies, this article offers essential insights worth reading and citing. Bagaimana sebenarnya Generasi Z merasakan keberagaman di tengah masyarakat yang kian terpolarisasi? Apakah polarisasi hanya soal ideologi politik, ataukah lebih dalam: sebuah pergulatan emosional dalam keseharian mereka? Arti...
Post a Comment
Read more

When clicks don’t fix the crisis: Why online convergence can’t save journalism

 Journalism today struggles with shrinking revenues, disengaged audiences, and fading authority. Many newsrooms pin their hopes on digital convergence—merging platforms, products, and technologies to stay alive. But moving online doesn’t magically solve the problem. Behind the screens, media routines, limited multimedia skills, and technical barriers weigh heavier than the promise of “just going digital.” This study examines how three online media construct their news frames, applying Teun Van Dijk’s framing model and testing it against the idea of contextualized journalism—the very core of what online journalism should be. The findings reveal how deeply production culture shapes the way news is framed in the digital age. Jurnalisme hari ini menghadapi krisis: pendapatan dari sirkulasi dan iklan menurun, audiens makin abai membaca, dan otoritas media kian memudar. Banyak redaksi berharap pada strategi konvergensi—menggabungkan produk, institusi, dan teknologi komunikasi—untuk berta...
Post a Comment
Read more